Gestational Diabetes

Conflicting results currently exists on the association between vitamin D and glucose metabolism. The role of maternal vitamin D status in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is not clear. This meta-analysis aimed to examine this role in women with GDM compared with normal glucose tolerance (NGT).|We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis by searching MEDLINE database, the Cochrane library and Uptodate Online for English-language literature up to September 2011. Summary odds ratios were calculated using a random-effects model meta-analysis.|Seven observational studies were eligible for the meta-analysis, including 2146 participants of whom 433 were diagnosed with GDM. Four studies reported a high incidence of vitamin D deficiency in pregnant women (>50%). Overall vitamin D deficiency (serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD)<50 nmol/l) in pregnancy was significantly related to the incidence of GDM with an odds ratio of 1.61 (95% CI 1.19-2.17; p=0.002). Serum 25OHD was significant

The risk of major congenital malformations (MCM) is increased in women with pregestational diabetes mellitus (PGDM). Whether this risk is increased in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is still debated. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review (and meta-analysis) of major congenital malformations in women with gestational diabetes versus a reference population.|We conducted a MEDLINE search (1 January 1995 to 31 December 2009) of original studies reporting data on major congenital malformations in women with gestational diabetes and a reference group. Information on pregestational diabetes was collected when available. Two investigators considered studies for inclusion and extracted data; discrepancies were solved by consensus. Meta-analysis tools were used to summarize results. MOOSE and PRISMA guidelines were followed.|Two case control and 15 cohort studies were selected out of 3488 retrieved abstracts. A higher risk of major congenital malformations was observed

To determine whether elective single embryo transfer (eSET) lowers the risk of poor perinatal outcomes associated with IVF, when [1] compared with double embryo transfer (DET) or multiple embryo transfer (MET), and separately, [2] compared with spontaneous conceptions.|Systematic review and meta-analysis.|Centers for reproductive care.|Infertility patients.|MEDLINE, Embase, and bibliographies were searched for the period 1978-2011. Two reviewers independently assessed titles, abstracts, and full studies, extracted data, and assessed quality. Dichotomous data were pooled using relative risks and continuous data with mean differences using a random effects model. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), case-control studies, and cohort studies that examined any of the primary or secondary outcomes in singleton, twin, or multiple-order infants conceived by eSET as compared with [1] those conceived by DET or MET or [2] spontaneously conceived singleton gestations were included.|Primary

Pregnancy hyperglycaemia without meeting gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) diagnostic criteria affects a significant proportion of pregnant women each year. It is associated with a range of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Although intensive management for women with GDM has been proven beneficial for women and their babies, there is little known about the effects of treating women with hyperglycaemia who do not meet diagnostic criteria for GDM and type 2 diabetes (T2DM).|To assess the effects of different types of management strategies for pregnant women with hyperglycaemia not meeting diagnostic criteria for GDM and T2DM (referred as borderline GDM in this review).|We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (30 September 2011).|Randomised and cluster-randomised trials comparing alternative management strategies for women with borderline GDM.|Two review authors independently assessed study eligibility, extracted data and assessed risk of bias of included

Search for studies:. Study Record Detail. Diabetes Prevention in Women With a Recent History of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus ( GDM).

Search for studies:. Study Record Detail. Increasing Screening for Type 2 Diabetes in Women With Previous Gestational Diabetes.

Search for studies:. Study Record Detail. Prevention of Diabetes Mellitus Development in Women Who Had Already Experienced A Gestational Diabetes.

Safety &Efficacy of Insulin Aspart vs. Regular Human Insulin in Gestational Diabetes.

Screening Methods for Gestational Diabetes. This study has been completed. Study NCT00295659 Information provided by Canadian Diabetes Association.

Elective single embryo transfer following in vitro fertilization.

The management of obstructive azoospermia: AUA best practice statement.

of in vitro fertilization ( IVF), to provide guidelines on the number of embryos to transfer in IVF-embryo transfer ( ET) in order to optimize healthy live births and minimize multiple pregnancies. ... Search terms included embryo transfer ( ET),

Search terms included assisted reproduction, assisted reproductive technology, ovulation induction, intracytoplasmic sperm injection ( ICSI), embryo transfer, and in vitro fertilization ( IVF). ... II-2A) 19. The clinical application of preimplantation

Ovulation induction in polycystic ovary syndrome.

Infertility

Online newsletter summarizing published findings from AHRQ-funded studies, new AHRQ publications and products, and funding opportunities.

This report presents key findings from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's (AHRQ) research portfolio during 2008.

in the laboratory ( i.e., in vitro fertilization and related procedures). ... ART procedures include those infertility treatments in which both eggs and sperm are handled in the laboratory for the purpose of establishing a pregnancy ( i.e., in vitro

Topic page summarizing evidence report on effectiveness of assisted reproductive technology.

Had a case the other day with the above finding on a pap. She was age 36 and had a Mirena in place. How do people feel about the idea of trying to do an EMB with an IUD in place? If not, how do we proceed?

Hello,

Has anyone tried FetalGrowth app (App Store for iPhone/iPad) ? I'm interested in using a simple and handy tool to calculate fetal percentiles, and I came across this app, which seems it does the job (plots growth charts, as well). I haven't seen anything else, besides this app, so I was wondering if there are people who have already tried it.

Thanks !

Welcome to the new ObGyn.net Forum!

To all the members of OB-GYN-L… Thank you for coming! I’m thrilled that you’ve decided to check out the new Forum site, and look forward to reading about what’s on your mind.

If you’re new to the ObGyn.net community... welcome aboard! You’ve just joined an outstanding group of physicians and health care professionals who have been sharing information, answering questions, and building professional relationships via the site’s listserv for nearly 20 years.

Feel free to poke around on the site to get a feel for things, or take a look at the Help Topics page for instructions on how to use the different features of the site.

A few quick tips:
For those of you who like getting new Forum messages delivered directly to your inbox, the first thing you’ll want to do is click on the ‘Follow this forum’ button on the main page. You’ll have the option of getting notifications immediately, as a daily digest, a weekly digest, or only when you’re not online (which is to say, if you’re on the site when someone posts a message, you won’t be notified of it). You won’t be able to post on the site just by replying to the email, but the message will contain a link that takes you directly to the message you’d like to reply to.

You can also follow individual conversations without following the whole list by going into the topic and clicking the ‘Follow this topic’ button next to the title.

Also, in ‘My Profile’ you can:

• Enter your professional information, including specialty, subspecialty, and education (by clicking ‘Edit my profile’)
  
• See your activity on the Forum, such as what discussions you have initiated or replied to, content you’ve ‘liked,’ and activity of people you’ve made your friends

In ‘My Settings’ you can:

• Add or change your photo
  
• Edit your birthday, gender, interests, location
  
• Create a signature for your posts
  
• Change the types of content you get notifications for, or change the way you receive notifications

If you have questions, feel free to respond to this post or send me a direct message by clicking on the envelope icon.

Happy posting!

I helped another physician with removal of a retained placenta last night, we were unsuccessful in removing it vaginally, her cervix was too closed to allow manual removal and we could only get a few pieces out with ring forceps and a large curette, so we did a laparotomy/hysterotomy and were able to preserve the uterus. The placenta turned out not to be an accreta and it was easily removed via that route through a low vertical incision on the uterus. Any thoughts on the appropriate CPT code would be appreciated. The patient came in through the ER five days after home delivery by her husband. She was severely anemic, rcvd 7 units of blood and is still quite ill and in the ICU but improving.

Ronald E. Ainsworth, MD, FACOG

Recently, I had the occasion to review a case of a term primigravida with PROM in a private hospital (no housestaff or in house obstetricians). She was seen by an obstetrician soon after arrival, evaluated, and pitocin induction begun.

She did not deliver for around 29 hours after admission, and the delivering obstetrician (a different physician) was physically present during the last 2 hours of labor prior to delivery.

Simply put, while the two involved obstetricians were in communication by phone with the nursing staff throughout labor (separately as their "shifts" did not overlap), no one actually came to the bedside and wrote a note) from admission until around 2 hours before delivery.

Medical staff bylaws call for a daily progress note; this bylaw was easily met.

In reviewing the case, it did not "feel good" that no one came to the bedside.

My questions:

1. Does anyone have or know of any guidelines to mandate such bedside attendance? Of course, we all hope that the involved physicians would not need said guidelines.
2. Does anyone have a suggestion of hospital/nursing protocols? Simply, in this case I would like to have had a charge nurse or bedside nurse simply say, "Hey, no one has been by for a while. What's up?"

Garry

Hey, what textbooks would you advise for my son who is beginning residency this summer?

Post here or email privately if better.

Thanks,

Garry

<p>Hello  friends ,

           I want to know how much does a facelift cost on average? Do you know anyone what is facelift cost ? please help me .........

Hello,

I really need help from OB/GYNs and I'm having a hard time getting it. I find your opinions really valuable. I'm researching recommendations for cosleeping. This is for my dissertation, so your time is truly appreciated! Please complete the full survey. It will help me tremendously.

The study takes about 5 to 10 minutes to complete. Please don't hesitate to contact me at bhamel@pacificu.edu with any questions.

If you are interested in participating, please follow the link provided below:

https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/Cosleeping

Thank you in advance for your time. If possible, please forward this to other OB/GYNs you know.

Sorry if this an innappropriate use of the forum. But it seems like the right place to find the participants I need.

.

Our hospital bought an electronic medical record (EMR) system for the clinics. There is a large hosptial group practice including pediatrics, medicine, FP, OB/GYN, and other specialities and sub-specialities. Furthermore, the hospitalists and the ER doctors are also employed in the same hosptial group practice.

The hospital spent millions of dollars on an EMR. As best I can tell there are only two useful things that the EMR does. One is to automatically calcualte the BMI, which it does very well. THe other is to make records available on any patient to any doctor anywhere in the practice. It does not do this well -- it requires lots of mouse movements and clicks and different documents come up in different formats, making it labor intenisve. But, with enough time, effort, and frustration, one can obtain copies of every document in the sustem, either on a computer screen or on paper.

Swith to the ER now. A paitnet whom I had seen the previous week in consultatio comes into the ER for a non-pregnancy problem. They call me on the telephone in the evening. "No problem", I say. I did a torough evaluation and wrote a detailed note on the patient and her OB and non-OB problems only a few days ago. "Just go to the EMR and you can print out my note with all the details."

Seems, however, that for some reason the EMR is not available in the ER (or on the wards for that matter). When I asked the hosptial administrator about it the next morning, he said that he and the hosptial lawyers were working on the problem.

Apparently the government thinks that the ER doctors and hospitalists have nothing better to do with their time than to print out copies of patients' medical records from the EMR and sell them on the black market. Therefore, we cannot let those nasty doctors have access to the EMR records. Nevermind that the ER doctors are in the same group practice as all the other doctors. Never mind that the patient is willing to sign a release so that the doctor who is taking care of her can see the records of the practice. We have to protect the patient even if it means that vital information is rendered unavailable and that things are made more difficult, complicated, and expensive. It reminds me of the Army in Viet Nam where they would have to "destroy a village in order to save it!" Apparently the EMR makes us destroy a patient in order to save her.

Thank GOD for the EMR. Three million dollars and the only benefit is that we can get a BMI 10 seconds faster.

I think the NEJM got it correct last month when they said in an atricle that the only ones who truly benefit from electronic medical record systems are the people who make and sell them.



Dean Huffman

Decline in Semen Concentration and Morphology in a Sample of 26,609 Men Close to General Population Between 1989 and 2005 in France


http://www.medscape....22498EV&spon=16