Recently a letter was sent to the Women's Health Forum by a patient who had undergone numerous surgeries in an effort to alleviate her pain due to surgical adhesions. Additionally, I recently had a patient whose case demonstrates a rather typical story for post-surgical adhesions, and her management. These two patient cases I hope you will find informative and "food for thought". 1) Toni is the patient who had undergone numerous prior surgeries, had the pain relieved for a week or so, and then it recurred, again. She is contemplating yet another surgical procedure, followed by several weeks of bed rest in the hope that such an approach will finally prove successful. My response: First of all, adhesions are a by product of the body's attempt to heal injured tissue. Surgery is controlled tissue injury!! The healing process begins immediately after the injury. If you cut your finger, it bleeds for a while, and then a clot forms, and if undisturbed, scar tissue permanently seals the injury site. A small cut can be accidentally re-opened within a few days if the injury site is accidentally bumped, but within several more days the scar is strong (i.e. fibrous) enough to remain permanently sealed. Within the abdomen, raw surfaces resulting from controlled "surgical injury", begin to seal over within hours of the tissue trauma. Initially, the healing tissues are very gelatinous and soft; adjacent structures may become somewhat "stuck" to other structures (e.g. bowel to the abdominal wall). The extent of this soft "attaching" tendency varies from patient to patient, the nature of the surgery, as well as compounding factors such as coincident or subsequent infection. Many areas of tissue injury form no adhesions whereas other areas stick together as if you used glue!! As the repairing process continues with time, the soft gelatinous attachments become more fibrous, less pliable, and very dense and strong (i.e. mature scar or adhesion formation). Your story is sooooo typical..... "I had adhesion surgery, was free of Pain for a few weeks and now I am worse than ever." This is reflecting IMHO, the maturing and progressive fibrous scarring that is occurring. Further IMHO, the worse thing you can do is to remain quiet, and allow these raw surfaces to further solidify. I encourage movement (side to side, knee chest, walking, as soon as the patient returns from the recovery room) every 15 minutes for the first 1-2 days. Non-conventionally, I re-laparoscope these severe-adhesion patients in 5 days while any new adhesions are soft and easily wiped away. So far this approach seems to work. Lastly, would suggest you research well the gyn surgeons available to you. Most gyns who encounter dense adhesions will almost immediately resort to laparotomy, perform a big incision (ie start the adhesion problem over again big-time!!), and then wonder why the patient becomes symptomatic again in weeks??? There are experienced advanced-laparoscopic surgeons out there who rarely have to resort to laparotomy. The key is the experience to qualify as an "advanced laparoscopic" surgeon. You need to query your doctors about these qualifications. Being able to remove an ovarian cyst, or cauterize a little endometriosis is NOT sufficient IMHO 2) Jodie was a 30year old woman with one child. In the preceding 8 years she had undergone several laparoscopies for endometriosis, as well as receiving several courses of Lupron for suppression. Her pelvic pain and tenderness would resolve for a while but then return to the point that she had become a pelvic cripple. Jodie decided to undertake a final procedure that would allow her to get on with her life. She underwent a laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy, with removal of her one remaining ovary. Endometriosis was encountered, and surgically destroyed. She was discharged the following day, and her pre-operative pelvic pain had totally resolved. Within the week however, Jodie began having excruciating deep pelvic pain, but only with bowel movements. The pain was so severe that she could only cope with bowel elimination if she took a potent pain pill. Jodie was agreeable to waiting several weeks so that the internal healing process would be complete, and hopefully the problem would abate. This did not happen. My conclusion was that she had formed a post-surgical adhesion(s) in her pelvis and only laparoscopy would be able to prove this suspicion and correct the problem. Next began a long hassle with her managed care insurance company, who mandated a consultation with a gastroenterologist!! Jodie underwent the mandated tests that demonstrated NOTHING (adhesions are rarely demonstrated on any of these tests). A final laparoscopy was ultimately performed and indeed the suspected adhesions were encountered, taken down, and at last she is 100% pain free. Adhesion problems can be totally incapacitating, causing continued pain, cramping, bowel disturbance, and tenderness. The most common alternative diagnosis is often irritable bowel syndrome, which affects as many as 20% of the population. The treatment of this disorder is medical. However if this therapy fails, and if the patients has had previous abdominal surgery, IMHO, pelvic/abdominal adhesions need to be strongly considered in the differential diagnosis.
TopicIndex
MedicaForums
Medica Forums -
5/23/13
Hello,
Has anyone tried FetalGrowth app (App Store for iPhone/iPad) ? I'm interested in using a simple and handy tool to calculate fetal percentiles, and I came across this app, which seems it does the job (plots growth charts, as well). I haven't seen anything else, besides this app, so I was wondering if there are people who have already tried it. Thanks !
Medica Forums -
5/19/13
Had a case the other day with the above finding on a pap. She was age 36 and had a Mirena in place. How do people feel about the idea of trying to do an EMB with an IUD in place? If not, how do we proceed?
Medica Forums -
5/12/13
Welcome to the new ObGyn.net Forum!
To all the members of OB-GYN-L… Thank you for coming! I’m thrilled that you’ve decided to check out the new Forum site, and look forward to reading about what’s on your mind. If you’re new to the ObGyn.net community... welcome aboard! You’ve just joined an outstanding group of physicians and health care professionals who have been sharing information, answering questions, and building professional relationships via the site’s listserv for nearly 20 years. Feel free to poke around on the site to get a feel for things, or take a look at the Help Topics page for instructions on how to use the different features of the site. A few quick tips: For those of you who like getting new Forum messages delivered directly to your inbox, the first thing you’ll want to do is click on the ‘Follow this forum’ button on the main page. You’ll have the option of getting notifications immediately, as a daily digest, a weekly digest, or only when you’re not online (which is to say, if you’re on the site when someone posts a message, you won’t be notified of it). You won’t be able to post on the site just by replying to the email, but the message will contain a link that takes you directly to the message you’d like to reply to. You can also follow individual conversations without following the whole list by going into the topic and clicking the ‘Follow this topic’ button next to the title. Also, in ‘My Profile’ you can:
Happy posting!
Medica Forums -
5/11/13
I helped another physician with removal of a retained placenta last night, we were unsuccessful in removing it vaginally, her cervix was too closed to allow manual removal and we could only get a few pieces out with ring forceps and a large curette, so we did a laparotomy/hysterotomy and were able to preserve the uterus. The placenta turned out not to be an accreta and it was easily removed via that route through a low vertical incision on the uterus. Any thoughts on the appropriate CPT code would be appreciated. The patient came in through the ER five days after home delivery by her husband. She was severely anemic, rcvd 7 units of blood and is still quite ill and in the ICU but improving.
Ronald E. Ainsworth, MD, FACOG
Medica Forums -
4/15/13
Recently, I had the occasion to review a case of a term primigravida with PROM in a private hospital (no housestaff or in house obstetricians). She was seen by an obstetrician soon after arrival, evaluated, and pitocin induction begun.
She did not deliver for around 29 hours after admission, and the delivering obstetrician (a different physician) was physically present during the last 2 hours of labor prior to delivery. Simply put, while the two involved obstetricians were in communication by phone with the nursing staff throughout labor (separately as their "shifts" did not overlap), no one actually came to the bedside and wrote a note) from admission until around 2 hours before delivery. Medical staff bylaws call for a daily progress note; this bylaw was easily met. In reviewing the case, it did not "feel good" that no one came to the bedside. My questions: 1. Does anyone have or know of any guidelines to mandate such bedside attendance? Of course, we all hope that the involved physicians would not need said guidelines. 2. Does anyone have a suggestion of hospital/nursing protocols? Simply, in this case I would like to have had a charge nurse or bedside nurse simply say, "Hey, no one has been by for a while. What's up?" Garry
Medica Forums -
4/12/13
Hey, what textbooks would you advise for my son who is beginning residency this summer?
Post here or email privately if better. Thanks, Garry
Medica Forums -
4/8/13
<p>Hello friends ,
I want to know how much does a facelift cost on average? Do you know anyone what is facelift cost ? please help me .........
Medica Forums -
4/7/13
Hello,
I really need help from OB/GYNs and I'm having a hard time getting it. I find your opinions really valuable. I'm researching recommendations for cosleeping. This is for my dissertation, so your time is truly appreciated! Please complete the full survey. It will help me tremendously. The study takes about 5 to 10 minutes to complete. Please don't hesitate to contact me at bhamel@pacificu.edu with any questions. If you are interested in participating, please follow the link provided below: https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/Cosleeping Thank you in advance for your time. If possible, please forward this to other OB/GYNs you know. Sorry if this an innappropriate use of the forum. But it seems like the right place to find the participants I need.
Medica Forums -
4/7/13
.
Our hospital bought an electronic medical record (EMR) system for the clinics. There is a large hosptial group practice including pediatrics, medicine, FP, OB/GYN, and other specialities and sub-specialities. Furthermore, the hospitalists and the ER doctors are also employed in the same hosptial group practice. The hospital spent millions of dollars on an EMR. As best I can tell there are only two useful things that the EMR does. One is to automatically calcualte the BMI, which it does very well. THe other is to make records available on any patient to any doctor anywhere in the practice. It does not do this well -- it requires lots of mouse movements and clicks and different documents come up in different formats, making it labor intenisve. But, with enough time, effort, and frustration, one can obtain copies of every document in the sustem, either on a computer screen or on paper. Swith to the ER now. A paitnet whom I had seen the previous week in consultatio comes into the ER for a non-pregnancy problem. They call me on the telephone in the evening. "No problem", I say. I did a torough evaluation and wrote a detailed note on the patient and her OB and non-OB problems only a few days ago. "Just go to the EMR and you can print out my note with all the details." Seems, however, that for some reason the EMR is not available in the ER (or on the wards for that matter). When I asked the hosptial administrator about it the next morning, he said that he and the hosptial lawyers were working on the problem. Apparently the government thinks that the ER doctors and hospitalists have nothing better to do with their time than to print out copies of patients' medical records from the EMR and sell them on the black market. Therefore, we cannot let those nasty doctors have access to the EMR records. Nevermind that the ER doctors are in the same group practice as all the other doctors. Never mind that the patient is willing to sign a release so that the doctor who is taking care of her can see the records of the practice. We have to protect the patient even if it means that vital information is rendered unavailable and that things are made more difficult, complicated, and expensive. It reminds me of the Army in Viet Nam where they would have to "destroy a village in order to save it!" Apparently the EMR makes us destroy a patient in order to save her. Thank GOD for the EMR. Three million dollars and the only benefit is that we can get a BMI 10 seconds faster. I think the NEJM got it correct last month when they said in an atricle that the only ones who truly benefit from electronic medical record systems are the people who make and sell them. Dean Huffman
Medica Forums -
4/7/13
Decline in Semen Concentration and Morphology in a Sample of 26,609 Men Close to General Population Between 1989 and 2005 in France
http://www.medscape....22498EV&spon=16 EducationalTutorialsEducational Tutorial: Complications of Laparoscopy
February 7, 2012 There are a variety of complications that can occur during laparoscopic surgery. In this tutorial learn some of the complications and tips to avoid them. Educational Tutorial: Low Molecular Weight Heparin in Recurrent Abortions
January 17, 2012 Review information on low molecular weight heparin in recurrent miscarriages in this educational tutorial. CaseStudiesFetal Abdomen with Gallbladder Calculi
Dr. Muktachand and Dr. Trupti , September 27, 2011
Sacrococcygeal Teratoma?
Dr. Jaydeep , September 14, 2011
Fetal Cardiac Anomalies
Joshua Abbott Copel, MD OBGYN.net Advisory Board Member , July 19, 2011
Single Umbilical Artery Color Doppler
Abana Cerekja , June 15, 2011
FromPhysiciansPracticeFive Steps to Improving Patient Access Judy Capko, May 21, 2013 Patient access is getting increased attention through reform initiatives. Here are five steps you can take to make sure patients get appropriate access to care in your office. Growing HIPAA Threat – Ignore Windows XP at Your Own Peril Marion K. Jenkins, May 21, 2013 Chances are good that you have some major ticking software time bombs lurking in your medical practice's computer environment, namely Windows XP and Server 2003. Finding Physician Work-Life Balance in the Small Moments Jennifer Frank, MD, May 21, 2013 At my practice and at home, things are always busy. There's laundry or homework, or a patient with needs. Three Areas to Reduce Costs at Your Medical Practice Greg Mertz, May 19, 2013 By taking a hard look at reducing costs for staffing, overhead, and technology at your medical practice, you may see increased physician compensation. Dos and Don’ts for Starting a Physician Blog Michael Woo-Ming, MD, May 18, 2013 Starting a physician blog can provide your medical practice with marketing benefits, but it's important to do it right.
MostPopular
MostPopular
MostPopular
SearchMedicaSearchResultFind peer-reviewed literature and websites for practicing medical professionals EventCalendar
|
|

