Laparoscopy, looking inside the abdomen through a tube placed through a small incision, is a procedure commonly used by gynecologists to diagnose and treat a number of medical conditions. Since the early 1900's when rudimentary laparoscopes were used to visualize, but not treat, abdominal diseases, advancements in this technique have led to the ability to perform complex surgical procedures through a few small incisions, rather than the larger incisions used in the past. Laparoscopy is usually performed through a small (1 centimeter) incision into the belly button with the patient under general anesthesia in the operating room. A camera is mounted to a long tube about as big around as one's first finger, which is placed into the incision in the belly button and into the abdominal cavity. Once inside carbon dioxide gas is used to expand the abdominal cavity so the internal organs can be visualized. The gynecologist either looks through the tube, or, more commonly, looks at a video monitor via the attached camera. A careful survey is made of the liver, appendix, the top layer of intestines, bladder, kidney tubes (ureters), and the gynecologic organs. Specifically, the gynecologic surgeon is able to fully visualize the uterus (womb), ovaries, fallopian tubes, rectum, and the bottom part of the cervix (the opening to the uterus) called the cul-de-sac. As one might imagine, this technique allows gynecologists to diagnose a large variety of important medical conditions. If treatment is necessary one or more smaller incisions can be made near the bikini line, each measuring only 5 millimeters (less than a pencil eraser). Long instruments are placed through these incisions so that tissue can be cut, grasped, removed, or burned. Specialized instruments such as sterile plastic baggies, retractors, or lasers can also be used through these incisions. The gynecologist and operating room staff then perform the surgery by moving the instruments by "hand-eye coordination" while watching the video monitor. Obviously, it takes some practice to do this type of surgery, since one can only touch the tissues from a distance, using the small, long instruments. Some physicians are now performing "office laparoscopy" using even smaller scopes and instruments on patients who are under light sedation in the office. This is still considered somewhat experimental by most gynecologists, and while this type of surgery may turn out to be safe, there are obvious safety concerns when performing complex surgery in a doctor's office, and not the hospital or a fully-equipped outpatient surgical center. Gynecologists use laparoscopy to treat a variety of female health problems. General surgeons also now use laparoscopy to perform surgeries such as appendectomies and removal of the gall bladder (cholecystectomy). Indications for gynecologic laparoscopy include the following: The decision to perform a laparoscopic procedure (versus using non-surgical treatment or using a larger scar for the planned surgery) is a very individual issue that requires close consultation between the patient and her physician. Laparoscopy is almost always an "outpatient" procedure, meaning patients feel well enough to go home the same evening as their surgery. However, some procedures are more involved and will require an overnight stay in the hospital. Furthermore, even though complications are generally unusual, laparoscopy is still a surgical procedure (to paraphrase an esteemed colleague of mine: "minor procedures are ones you perform on someone else"!). All surgical procedures have potential complications. Some potential complications from laparoscopy include damage to the intestines (particularly while putting in the gas to expand the abdomen), nicking of blood vessels (especially hidden vessels under the skin of the abdomen), damage to the bladder or kidney tubes, which may require additional surgical procedures to repair, and damage or scarring of the gynecologic organs, which may create fertility problems in the future. Finally, due to the complexity of such procedures, some laparoscopic procedures may require conversion into a much larger procedure, called a "laparotomy" which entails making a large incision into the abdomen to either fix a medical problem that cannot be tackled via laparoscopy, or fix a complication that has occurred during the laparoscopic procedure. As always, medical treatments are individual and rarely perfectly straightforward. As part of the important informed consent process a patient (and her family, if she wishes) need to sit down with the doctor and discuss the risks and benefits of each planned procedure. Physicians need to remember that sometimes patients have a different impression of surgical procedures than doctors. Thus education and an honest assessment of the risks and benefits is necessary. Patients should keep in mind that despite the best efforts of the doctor, and despite his or her skills, sometimes complications can occur during surgical procedures. Simply put, there is always a balance between the potential benefits of having a surgical procedure performed and the potential chance of complications that might occur from that procedure. After laparoscopy most patients go home that evening with a prescription for pain medications and advise to "take it easy" for about a week. Each patient will heal differently. Many women report shoulder pain due to the gas used to distend the abdomen. Others note pain at the incision sites, while others feel sharp or aching pains deep in the pelvis (above the vagina) due to inflammation from healing tissues that have been manipulated or cut during surgery. All of these are normal, and can be relieved by appropriate use of pain medications, heating pads, and rest. Most gynecologists advise against driving, exercise, sex, or heavy lifting for 1-2 weeks. I have seen patients golf within 3 days of a laparoscopic vaginal hysterectomy while others are unable to venture outside of the house for a week after the same procedure. Healing is a very individual process! Before leaving the hospital a patient should be comfortable with the directions she receives from her nurses and doctor. Also, she should have access to her doctor's answering service number, and should report any of the following symptoms immediately: an expanding bruise under an incision (this may be due to a blood clot, or hematoma, under the skin), recurrent vomiting, fever, or abdominal distention (may be due to intestinal damage), heavy bleeding through the vagina (spotting is common and usually harmless), pain that worsens despite pain medication, and severe flank (kidney) pain, which may alert your doctor to kinking or damage to one of the tubes that comes from the kidney to the bladder. In summary, laparoscopy is a wonderful tool for performing gynecologic surgery. Yet, despite the complexity of the surgery, most women go home without difficulty the same day. Whether or not laparoscopic surgery is advisable to diagnose or treat a particular gynecologic problem requires a careful consultation with an experienced gynecologist, who can help the patient weigh the pros and cons of laparoscopy versus other options. D. Ashley Hill, M.D.
Associate Director
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Florida Hospital Family Practice Residency
Orlando, Florida
Laparoscopy
By D. Ashley Hill, M.D. |
June 28, 2011
Additional information can be found at: http://www.familyinternet.com/peds/img/img1109.htm. |
TopicIndex
MedicaForums
Medica Forums -
5/19/13
Had a case the other day with the above finding on a pap. She was age 36 and had a Mirena in place. How do people feel about the idea of trying to do an EMB with an IUD in place? If not, how do we proceed?
Medica Forums -
5/16/13
Hello,
Has anyone tried FetalGrowth app (App Store for iPhone/iPad) ? I'm interested in using a simple and handy tool to calculate fetal percentiles, and I came across this app, which seems it does the job (plots growth charts, as well). I haven't seen anything else, besides this app, so I was wondering if there are people who have already tried it. Thanks !
Medica Forums -
5/12/13
Welcome to the new ObGyn.net Forum!
To all the members of OB-GYN-L… Thank you for coming! I’m thrilled that you’ve decided to check out the new Forum site, and look forward to reading about what’s on your mind. If you’re new to the ObGyn.net community... welcome aboard! You’ve just joined an outstanding group of physicians and health care professionals who have been sharing information, answering questions, and building professional relationships via the site’s listserv for nearly 20 years. Feel free to poke around on the site to get a feel for things, or take a look at the Help Topics page for instructions on how to use the different features of the site. A few quick tips: For those of you who like getting new Forum messages delivered directly to your inbox, the first thing you’ll want to do is click on the ‘Follow this forum’ button on the main page. You’ll have the option of getting notifications immediately, as a daily digest, a weekly digest, or only when you’re not online (which is to say, if you’re on the site when someone posts a message, you won’t be notified of it). You won’t be able to post on the site just by replying to the email, but the message will contain a link that takes you directly to the message you’d like to reply to. You can also follow individual conversations without following the whole list by going into the topic and clicking the ‘Follow this topic’ button next to the title. Also, in ‘My Profile’ you can:
Happy posting!
Medica Forums -
5/11/13
I helped another physician with removal of a retained placenta last night, we were unsuccessful in removing it vaginally, her cervix was too closed to allow manual removal and we could only get a few pieces out with ring forceps and a large curette, so we did a laparotomy/hysterotomy and were able to preserve the uterus. The placenta turned out not to be an accreta and it was easily removed via that route through a low vertical incision on the uterus. Any thoughts on the appropriate CPT code would be appreciated. The patient came in through the ER five days after home delivery by her husband. She was severely anemic, rcvd 7 units of blood and is still quite ill and in the ICU but improving.
Ronald E. Ainsworth, MD, FACOG
Medica Forums -
4/15/13
Recently, I had the occasion to review a case of a term primigravida with PROM in a private hospital (no housestaff or in house obstetricians). She was seen by an obstetrician soon after arrival, evaluated, and pitocin induction begun.
She did not deliver for around 29 hours after admission, and the delivering obstetrician (a different physician) was physically present during the last 2 hours of labor prior to delivery. Simply put, while the two involved obstetricians were in communication by phone with the nursing staff throughout labor (separately as their "shifts" did not overlap), no one actually came to the bedside and wrote a note) from admission until around 2 hours before delivery. Medical staff bylaws call for a daily progress note; this bylaw was easily met. In reviewing the case, it did not "feel good" that no one came to the bedside. My questions: 1. Does anyone have or know of any guidelines to mandate such bedside attendance? Of course, we all hope that the involved physicians would not need said guidelines. 2. Does anyone have a suggestion of hospital/nursing protocols? Simply, in this case I would like to have had a charge nurse or bedside nurse simply say, "Hey, no one has been by for a while. What's up?" Garry
Medica Forums -
4/12/13
Hey, what textbooks would you advise for my son who is beginning residency this summer?
Post here or email privately if better. Thanks, Garry
Medica Forums -
4/8/13
<p>Hello friends ,
I want to know how much does a facelift cost on average? Do you know anyone what is facelift cost ? please help me .........
Medica Forums -
4/7/13
Hello,
I really need help from OB/GYNs and I'm having a hard time getting it. I find your opinions really valuable. I'm researching recommendations for cosleeping. This is for my dissertation, so your time is truly appreciated! Please complete the full survey. It will help me tremendously. The study takes about 5 to 10 minutes to complete. Please don't hesitate to contact me at bhamel@pacificu.edu with any questions. If you are interested in participating, please follow the link provided below: https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/Cosleeping Thank you in advance for your time. If possible, please forward this to other OB/GYNs you know. Sorry if this an innappropriate use of the forum. But it seems like the right place to find the participants I need.
Medica Forums -
4/7/13
.
Our hospital bought an electronic medical record (EMR) system for the clinics. There is a large hosptial group practice including pediatrics, medicine, FP, OB/GYN, and other specialities and sub-specialities. Furthermore, the hospitalists and the ER doctors are also employed in the same hosptial group practice. The hospital spent millions of dollars on an EMR. As best I can tell there are only two useful things that the EMR does. One is to automatically calcualte the BMI, which it does very well. THe other is to make records available on any patient to any doctor anywhere in the practice. It does not do this well -- it requires lots of mouse movements and clicks and different documents come up in different formats, making it labor intenisve. But, with enough time, effort, and frustration, one can obtain copies of every document in the sustem, either on a computer screen or on paper. Swith to the ER now. A paitnet whom I had seen the previous week in consultatio comes into the ER for a non-pregnancy problem. They call me on the telephone in the evening. "No problem", I say. I did a torough evaluation and wrote a detailed note on the patient and her OB and non-OB problems only a few days ago. "Just go to the EMR and you can print out my note with all the details." Seems, however, that for some reason the EMR is not available in the ER (or on the wards for that matter). When I asked the hosptial administrator about it the next morning, he said that he and the hosptial lawyers were working on the problem. Apparently the government thinks that the ER doctors and hospitalists have nothing better to do with their time than to print out copies of patients' medical records from the EMR and sell them on the black market. Therefore, we cannot let those nasty doctors have access to the EMR records. Nevermind that the ER doctors are in the same group practice as all the other doctors. Never mind that the patient is willing to sign a release so that the doctor who is taking care of her can see the records of the practice. We have to protect the patient even if it means that vital information is rendered unavailable and that things are made more difficult, complicated, and expensive. It reminds me of the Army in Viet Nam where they would have to "destroy a village in order to save it!" Apparently the EMR makes us destroy a patient in order to save her. Thank GOD for the EMR. Three million dollars and the only benefit is that we can get a BMI 10 seconds faster. I think the NEJM got it correct last month when they said in an atricle that the only ones who truly benefit from electronic medical record systems are the people who make and sell them. Dean Huffman
Medica Forums -
4/7/13
Decline in Semen Concentration and Morphology in a Sample of 26,609 Men Close to General Population Between 1989 and 2005 in France
http://www.medscape....22498EV&spon=16 EducationalTutorialsEducational Tutorial: Complications of Laparoscopy
February 7, 2012 There are a variety of complications that can occur during laparoscopic surgery. In this tutorial learn some of the complications and tips to avoid them. Educational Tutorial: Low Molecular Weight Heparin in Recurrent Abortions
January 17, 2012 Review information on low molecular weight heparin in recurrent miscarriages in this educational tutorial. CaseStudiesFetal Abdomen with Gallbladder Calculi
Dr. Muktachand and Dr. Trupti , September 27, 2011
Sacrococcygeal Teratoma?
Dr. Jaydeep , September 14, 2011
Fetal Cardiac Anomalies
Joshua Abbott Copel, MD OBGYN.net Advisory Board Member , July 19, 2011
Single Umbilical Artery Color Doppler
Abana Cerekja , June 15, 2011
FromPhysiciansPracticeFive Steps to Improving Patient Access Judy Capko, May 21, 2013 Patient access is getting increased attention through reform initiatives. Here are five steps you can take to make sure patients get appropriate access to care in your office. Growing HIPAA Threat – Ignore Windows XP at Your Own Peril Marion K. Jenkins, May 21, 2013 Chances are good that you have some major ticking software time bombs lurking in your medical practice's computer environment, namely Windows XP and Server 2003. Finding Physician Work-Life Balance in the Small Moments Jennifer Frank, MD, May 21, 2013 At my practice and at home, things are always busy. There's laundry or homework, or a patient with needs. Three Areas to Reduce Costs at Your Medical Practice Greg Mertz, May 19, 2013 By taking a hard look at reducing costs for staffing, overhead, and technology at your medical practice, you may see increased physician compensation. Dos and Don’ts for Starting a Physician Blog Michael Woo-Ming, MD, May 18, 2013 Starting a physician blog can provide your medical practice with marketing benefits, but it's important to do it right.
MostPopular
MostPopular
MostPopular
Comments
Comments
SearchMedicaSearchResultFind peer-reviewed literature and websites for practicing medical professionals EventCalendar
|
